The Website America Can't Touch
Evidence-first pattern recognition. Sourced to reputable reporting.
This article discusses suicide, online encouragement of suicide, and the deaths of children and young people. It names no methods and no sites. If you are in a dark place right now, the first section is for you.
If this content may be triggering, skip to recovery resources →
Editor's Note
This piece follows WHO media guidance on suicide reporting. It does not name the forum, its address, or the method it promotes, because naming them raises their profile and does nothing for the reader. Every factual claim is sourced at the bottom. If you are in crisis, the first section of this article is written for you.
The Pattern
Before you read this. If you searched for the site this article is about and landed here instead, pause. The site you are looking for promises certainty about your pain. It is lying. Crisis states feel permanent because that is what crisis states do, and a community built around confirming your worst conclusion is not a community. It is a funnel. Call or text 988 (US), text HOME to 741741, or open our Support Resources page for routes by country, including Befrienders Worldwide if you are outside the US. The rest of this article is about the machinery. This block is about you. Stay for both.
In December 2021, the American government found out that a website was killing its citizens. A New York Times investigation had just identified 45 people who were active on a suicide discussion forum and then died by suicide. Twenty-two of them lived in the United States. Three were minors, despite the site’s claimed 18+ rule [1]. The reporting was careful, deliberate, and devastating, and the journalists had fought hard over whether to name the site at all [2].
Congress moved fast. Representative Lori Trahan led seven members in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland asking whether the Department of Justice could investigate the site, prosecute its operators, and delist it from American search results [4]. Within 48 hours, the full bipartisan leadership of the House Energy and Commerce Committee demanded briefings from search engines, hosting companies, and the Surgeon General [5].
The letter contains the sentence that explains everything since. “While it is our understanding that there is no federal law criminalizing assisting or encouraging suicide,” the lawmakers wrote, “we write to do our due diligence” [4]. America’s elected representatives had to ask whether their own government possessed the authority to act. Four and a half years later, the site is still online. The death count has kept climbing. This is the story of what happened in the gap between the outrage and the law that never came.
What the site is
The forum did not appear from nowhere. It is the latest body of an old organism. Its lineage runs back through a banned Reddit community to the Usenet era, and it was founded in March 2018, days after its predecessor subreddit was removed [3]. Its two founders are American men who describe themselves as incels and who ran a constellation of manosphere forums alongside it. One of those forums was described in a 2022 report as the largest forum dedicated to incel ideology. The suicide forum was notable among their properties as the only one that admitted women [3].
The scale is not small. The site reported over 50,000 registered members and nearly 10 million page views in a single month of 2023 [3]. The New York Times found that only 5 percent of posts concerned recovery, and that among the hundred most-viewed posts, 53 contained instructions or discussion of methods and 28 narrated attempts in real time. Attempts were the most-viewed content on the site. Members praised each other with words like “brave” and “hero.” When users posted goodbye threads and went silent, the moderators eventually deleted their accounts, sealing the record from families and investigators [1][4].
The NYT team named the site and its promoted method exactly once each, under protest, after consulting medical experts, law enforcement, and bereaved families [2]. We are making the same choice. You do not need the address. If you are looking for it, the first block of this article is for you.
The American legal void
Here is the machinery of the void. Four steps, none of them complicated, all of them still in place.
There is no federal crime. Most US states have laws against assisting suicide, but federal law grants websites immunity for most user-generated content, and no federal statute makes it a crime to encourage suicide online [3][4]. Trahan’s letter asked the DOJ six questions about what could be done. The questions have never been answered by a prosecution.
Congress tried to fix that. In November 2022, Trahan joined Representatives Carey, Porter, and Stewart to introduce the Stop Online Suicide Assistance Forums Act, a bipartisan bill to close the gap [6][7]. It died with the 117th Congress. It has not been reintroduced.
The platforms then declined to move without a law. The House committee’s pressure pushed Bing to lower the site’s ranking, but Google and Bing both refused to delist it absent a legal requirement [3]. In May 2026, Google denied breaching UK law by continuing to promote the forum in search results [13]. The search engines were waiting for an order. The United States has never issued one.
And the arithmetic is brutal. At the time of the congressional letter, the site was drawing about 6 million views a month. The national suicide prevention lifeline drew about a quarter of that [4]. Four people seeking the forum for every one reaching the lifeline. That ratio is not a statistic. It is a scoreboard.
The states eventually started moving alone. In 2026, Tennessee became the clearest example when Governor Lee signed the Grace Anne Sparks Coercive Suicide Prevention Law, making coercive suicide a felony, named for a young woman whose death her family traced to online coercion [8]. It is real progress. It is also one state, filling one tile of a mosaic that Congress was supposed to lay.
What every other country did
The uncomfortable fact is that every country with a usable law used it, and the country that hosts the site did not.
The first move came from Australia. It blocked the site’s original domain in 2019 under its telecommunications act, and after an ABC investigation linked the forum’s promoted method to a sudden rise in deaths, Australia’s medicines regulator reclassified the substance to restrict its sale [3]. When Australian ISPs moved to block the site, the forum blocked Australia first, announcing that “anti-liberty countries will just be blocked” [3].
Germany removed the site from search results in 2020. Italy’s prosecutors blocked it in 2021 after two teenagers died. Turkey blocked it in 2023 [3].
Britain has fought the longest and hardest fight, because Britain is where the bodies have been counted most carefully. Coroners warned the UK government about the forum 65 times [12]. In May 2026, Ofcom fined the forum £950,000, finding that illegal content encouraging and assisting suicide had been present on the site consistently throughout its investigation, some of it pinned or reposted by the operator itself [9][10]. The operator never paid. In July 2026, after the forum geoblocked UK users, Ofcom announced it had no further legal routes available, conceding that access via VPN remains open [11]. The Molly Rose Foundation, founded after 14-year-old Molly Russell’s death, called the decision a failure of moral courage and joined bereaved families in demanding a public inquiry [11][12]. Britain has counted at least 164 deaths linked to the forum [9].
One of the founders lives in Uruguay, where prosecutors found it very difficult to establish a crime because the law requires personal involvement [3]. Jurisdiction is the whole game. The site’s operators understood that before any regulator did. They built in America, where no federal law reaches them, and treated every country that tried to protect its citizens as “anti-liberty.”
Then the inversion. In June 2026, a British man was jailed for encouraging suicides in the United States through Discord [15]. Britain is prosecuting harm aimed at Americans because America will not.
The alibi
Every harmful institution needs a story about itself, and this one has three.
The first is that it is not what it is. The forum describes itself as “pro-choice,” a discussion space, while its most-viewed content is method instruction and real-time attempts [1][3]. That is harm-sanitization: laundering what the thing does through a vocabulary borrowed from rights movements.
The second is that it is a free speech project. When regulators moved, the operator quoted Mark Twain on censorship and framed enforcement as government overreach [9]. One founder posted that harassing him “isn’t going to solve the mental health crisis” [3]. This is label-weaponization at its cleanest: taking the most sacred phrase in American law and using it as a shield for the one behavior American law forgot to forbid. The same rhetoric is now operating at state level. In December 2025, the US imposed visa restrictions on European critics of online harms, casting safety regulation as censorship from abroad, while Meta sued Ofcom over its enforcement regime. Free speech is becoming the export product that protects the forum.
The third alibi is the terms of service. The site’s own rules prohibit assisting and encouraging suicide. Anyone who visits can confirm the rule is not enforced. Unenforced rules are not safety measures. They are legal insulation [4].
What it does to a person in crisis
Strip the politics away and the site is a manipulation engine. Deceit documents these patterns in cults, abusive relationships, and institutions. The forum runs all of them.
It forecloses the future. Crisis is a state, not an identity, and states change. The forum’s entire output argues the opposite: that the pain is permanent, that recovery posts are a minority to be tolerated, that the decision has already been made. Choice-foreclosure dressed as compassion.
It isolates through concern. When members share hotline numbers or recovery resources, other members respond with hostility and accusations of being “pro-life” [3]. The people trying to keep you alive are framed as the enemy of your autonomy. Isolation-through-concern, executed by the inmates.
It conditions belonging on momentum. Community, being seen, being answered at 3am, are real needs. The forum supplies them, and the price of continued belonging is movement toward the outcome. Praise flows toward the people who follow through. This is belonging-weaponization, and it is why families describe their loved ones as groomed rather than merely influenced.
It manages the evidence. Accounts of the dead are deleted after their goodbye threads, sealing the record from the people with the most reason to open it [1][4].
The second wave is worse. The 764 network and the broader “Com” ecosystem moved from encouragement to active coercion: teenagers recruiting other teenagers through games and chat platforms, sextortion escalating into forced self-harm, harm recorded for status, victims pressured into becoming perpetrators [14]. The FBI investigates it under the label “nihilistic violent extremism” [18]. Washington State’s Pierce County is suing Discord after a teenager’s livestreamed death [16]. The Washington Post documented a 15-year-old girl pushing a suicidal boy to kill himself [17]. Researchers counted at least 295 arrests linked to these networks in 33 countries [14]. That story deserves its own piece. It will get one.
The counter is not a block. It is a life.
Blocking is necessary and not sufficient, and the people closest to this harm say so. April Foreman, a psychologist on the executive board of the American Association of Suicidology, argued in the earliest coverage that the answer is not only removing the site but building better systems of support for people with suicidal ideation [3]. A recent policy paper makes the same case: reduce the supply of instruction, but invest far more in what people are being steered toward [20]. Research also keeps finding the connection that alarms regulators: interest in these sites tracks with suicide rates, which means the search box is part of the harm pathway and the help pathway at once [21].
What actually pulls a person back is humbler than the forum’s promises, and stronger. Crisis states pass. That is the single most replicated fact in suicidology, and the one fact the forum cannot admit, because the entire product is the claim that yours will not. Follow-up contact works: a call, a text, a person who checked in after the worst night. Roles work: being needed is a different thing from being praised for leaving. The forum offers an audience for your ending. The alternative is someone who wants you around long enough to find out what the next year actually holds.
If you are reading this in crisis, hear this plainly. Purpose is not found. It is built, and building takes time, and you have to be here for the building. The forum’s certainty is a sales pitch. The uncertainty of staying alive is where everything you have not met yet is hiding.
What you can do
This is the part where Deceit stops describing the pattern and hands you the wrench. Pick the block that fits you.
If you are struggling right now.
- Call or text 988 in the US, any hour, free and confidential [23]. Outside the US, use the Befrienders Worldwide finder [24].
- If a voice call is too much, text HOME to 741741 (Crisis Text Line).
- LGBTQ+ young people under 25: the Trevor Project, 866-488-7386, or text START to 678678.
- Veterans, service members, and their families: dial 988, then press 1.
- Our full directory, by country and situation, is at /resources.
- One more move that costs nothing: tell one person. A friend, a relative, a coworker. Say the sentence out loud to a human who can sit with you. The forum wants you alone with it. Refuse that.
If you are angry, here is where to aim it.
- Make Congress reintroduce the bill. The Stop Online Suicide Assistance Forums Act (H.R. 9260, 117th Congress) died in 2022 and was never brought back [6][7]. Email your House member through house.gov. One sentence is enough: “Please reintroduce the Stop Online Suicide Assistance Forums Act.” Bills are reintroduced because constituents ask.
- Push your state to the Tennessee line. Tennessee’s Grace Anne Sparks Coercive Suicide Prevention Law makes coercive suicide a felony [8]. Ask your state legislators whether your state has an equivalent. If not, ask why not.
- Stand with the families. The Molly Rose Foundation’s campaign against pro-suicide forums and the bereaved families’ call for a public inquiry are the organized pressure on this issue [12][22]. Support them, amplify them, and if you are in the UK, add your name to the inquiry demand.
- Report the networks. If a minor is being pressured, blackmailed, or coerced online, report to the NCMEC CyberTipline at cybertipline.org. For coercion networks and threats, tips.fbi.gov. For internet-enabled crime, ic3.gov. Preserve screenshots and usernames before deleting anything.
- Report to the platforms. Discord, Roblox, and the major chat platforms all have safety reporting paths. Moderation moves when reports arrive in volume.
- Never link the forum. Not in outrage, not in warnings, not with “do not visit.” Every link is referral traffic. The New York Times named it once under protest [2]. You do not need to name it at all.
- Volunteer where the math is broken. The forum drew four times the traffic of the national lifeline [4]. 988 centers recruit and train volunteers [23]. If you want to fight this with your own hours, that is the front line.
If you are a parent, teacher, or coach.
- Learn the signs that coercion networks produce: new or concealed self-harm, withdrawal from family and friends, secrecy about online interactions, sudden account changes [19].
- Ask directly and stay calm. “Are you thinking about suicide?” asked plainly, followed by listening, is the move that works. Anger shuts the door.
- If you find goodbye posts, coercion, or blackmail, preserve the evidence, report it, and get professional help involved. You do not have to solve it alone, and you should not try.
The site this article will not name has survived eight years of domain seizures, national blocks, search delistings, a £950,000 fine, and 164 counted British deaths. It survives because it lives in the one jurisdiction that decided the problem was too hard. The law is a fixable gap. The families are organized. The reporting channels exist. The only part of this fight that requires everyone is the oldest one: being the person who makes staying alive feel like it has a point.
That is not policy. That is the whole point.
For Shane. August 5.
Patterns in this piece
Harm sanitization
The thing was ugly, so they renamed it. The new name let you look without flinching.
Choice foreclosure
You picked freely. The menu was written so only one option could survive. Your choice was the cover.
Belonging weaponization
Belonging is presented as a truth, then used to sort the public into rightful residents and tolerated occupants.
Isolation through concern
You lost three friends and called it growth. You did not lose them. They were removed from you, carefully, one at a time, and each removal was explained as something done for you.
Label weaponization
The label arrives pre-verified. The target is forced to defend against a charge that has no evidentiary standard.
Compliance theater
You signed the pledge and felt better. The signing was the whole thing. Nothing changed except the signing.
Sources
- The New York Times, Where the Despairing Log On (Twohey and Dance, 9 Dec 2021)
- Poynter, How The New York Times handled life-or-death ethical issues while reporting on a popular suicide website (16 Dec 2021)
- Wikipedia, Sanctioned Suicide (history, responses, and deaths overview)
- Rep. Lori Trahan, Trahan Leads Bipartisan Call for Action to Stop "Sanctioned Suicide" Website (21 Dec 2021)
- House Energy and Commerce Committee, E&C Leaders Request Briefings Following Alarming Reports of a Website Encouraging Suicide (20 Dec 2021)
- Congress.gov, H.R. 9260, Stop Online Suicide Assistance Forums Act (117th Congress)
- Rep. John Carey, Trahan, Carey, Porter, Stewart Unveil Bipartisan Legislation to Stop Online Suicide (2 Nov 2022)
- News Channel 5 Nashville, Gov. Lee signs Grace Anne's Law, making coercive suicide a felony in Tennessee (2026)
- The Guardian, US-based internet suicide forum implicated in 160 UK deaths fined £950,000 (Booth, 13 May 2026)
- Ofcom, Ofcom fines online suicide forum £950,000 (13 May 2026)
- BBC News, Ofcom unable to take further legal action against suicide forum (Cress, 20 Jul 2026)
- Molly Rose Foundation, Bereaved families and survivors call for public inquiry into pro-suicide forum failures (Oct 2025)
- The Guardian, Google denies breaching law by promoting suicide forum linked to 164 UK deaths (14 May 2026)
- The Guardian, Inside the horrifying online network where children coerce others to commit violence and self-harm (21 Jul 2026)
- Reuters, Man jailed in UK for encouraging US suicide via Discord chat platform (12 Jun 2026)
- KING 5, Pierce County lawsuit alleges Discord ignored warnings before Gig Harbor teen livestreamed suicide (2026)
- The Washington Post, He was suicidal and needed help. A 15-year-old girl pushed him to kill himself (10 Dec 2024)
- The Guardian, FBI opens inquiry into 764, online group that sexually exploits and encourages minors to self-harm (11 May 2025)
- Australian Federal Police, Information for parents and carers on online coercion networks
- NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, How to Reduce the Harm of Pro-Suicide Websites (Fisher, 2024)
- JMIR, Association Between Prosuicide Website Searches Through Google and Suicide Rates (2024)
- Molly Rose Foundation, Campaign against pro-suicide forums
- 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline
- Befrienders Worldwide, crisis centre finder