Resource feedback route
The resource feedback form stored the note you sent about a listing, link, community, or support route so it could be reviewed before the directory changed. Use a safe email only if follow-up is actually safe for you.
Recovered Archive / Privacy
Privacy
If you used share, submit, the resource feedback form, or the newsletter, the project stored the information you sent so it could be reviewed. That included the text you entered, the email address you chose to provide, and basic submission metadata such as time received.
If you switched resource country packs, the site stored a small preference in your browser so the next support page could open in the same country instead of guessing again.
Nothing from those forms published automatically. The first step was always private review.
The project did not ask for more than it needed. If a situation was active or unsafe, keep identifying details to the minimum required and use safer routes first.
What this means in practice
- ▌ Resource notes and signups are stored privately for review.
- ▌ Email addresses are used for direct follow-up only.
- ▌ The country-pack preference only remembers your route choice; it is not an account system.
- ▌ The project does not treat submissions as automatic permission to publish.
- ▌ If you need a correction or deletion request handled, use direct contact.
Routes that stored data
Newsletter route
The newsletter stored your email, optional name, and stated interests for manual review before anything was added. It was a small review queue, not an automated growth funnel.
Country preference
The resources hub can remember the last country pack you chose so the next visit opens with the right support routes. You can overwrite that choice by switching countries again.
Use contact when the request is administrative. Corrections, deletion requests, and operational questions should go through direct contact rather than being buried inside a story submission.