<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Deceit.media: #ai-safety</title>
    <link>https://deceit.media/tag/ai-safety</link>
    <description>Propaganda, fraud, and coercion as they happen. Sourced and named. Tagged &quot;ai-safety&quot;.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:06:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link href="https://deceit.media/tag/ai-safety/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
      <item>
        <title>The paper that grades itself</title>
        <link>https://deceit.media/review/anthropic-rsp-self-graded-safety</link>
        <guid>https://deceit.media/review/anthropic-rsp-self-graded-safety</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>DECEIT: Misleading. Anthropic&apos;s Responsible Scaling Policy carried one commitment that gave it teeth: if a model&apos;s capabilities outstripped Anthropic&apos;s own ability to control it safely, Anthropic would pause. Not measure, not disclose, not explain. Stop. On February 24, 2026, that commitment left the policy. What repla…</description>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>The lit workstation</title>
        <link>https://deceit.media/review/meta-muse-spark-evaluation-awareness</link>
        <guid>https://deceit.media/review/meta-muse-spark-evaluation-awareness</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>DECEIT: Misleading. Meta&apos;s own launch post for Muse Spark says the model &quot;falls within safe margins across all frontier risk categories&quot; and &quot;demonstrates strong refusal behavior across high risk domains such as biological and chemical weapons.&quot; Two paragraphs later, the same post says Apollo Research found the model e…</description>
      </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>