Policy

AI Use

Last reviewed: 2026-08-20

Deceit publishes on the harms of this technology and is itself built with it. Both of those are true. This page states how much, how it is measured, where the line sits, and what we have published on the subject.

The measurement

A commit made through an assistant carries a Co-Authored-By trailer in its message. That trailer is a fact recorded in the repository, not an estimate or a recollection. Bucketing every line ever added by whether its commit carried one produces the figures below, measured across all six project repositories on 2026-08-20.

Prose

237,668 lines added
No machine signature, 227,410 (95.7%)Machine-signed, 10,258 (4.3%)

Code

427,827 lines added
No machine signature, 413,646 (96.7%)Machine-signed, 14,181 (3.3%)

Commits

1,480 across six repositories
No machine signature, 1,249 (84.4%)Machine-signed, 231 (15.6%)

What that measurement cannot tell you

A trailer proves assistance where it appears. Its absence proves nothing: a trailer can be switched off, and a different tool leaves none at all. The unsigned share is therefore a ceiling, not a finding. The true figure sits below it, and the repository does not record by how much.

That limit is published here because Deceit does not accept unmarked numbers from anyone else, and will not ask you to accept one from us. A figure whose weakness is hidden is doing the same work as the propaganda this publication exists to take apart.

Where the line sits

What we have published about AI

38 published pieces touch this subject. These are the ones to start with.

AI tools now generate photorealistic child sexual abuse material at scale. Platforms report numbers that obscure the problem. A Senate inquiry found the reports unusable. Meta approved ads containing the material. The children are not protected by the system that claims to protect them.

AI presents documented risks to labor, privacy, public institutions, and the environment. A serious left politics must turn that criticism into rules, public capacity, and worker power.

Six AI-generated fakes went viral in 2026. Each followed the same pipeline: generation, framing, amplification, confirmation, belief. The correction always arrived last. This is the mechanism, traced end to end.

Fabricated AI images of Epstein, Maduro, and Strickland went viral in 2025. The deeper risk is the liar's dividend: once any image might be fake, real evidence gets dismissed too. How to verify before you share.

Musk told X users to fact-check with Grok during the Iran war. Within days Grok had misidentified real footage, placed a Glasgow fire in Tel Aviv, and doubled down when corrected. The authority problem of an embedded AI.

America turned against AI while using it daily. Globally, 59% say the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, and the number is rising. What the backlash gets right, what it manufactures, and what the evidence actually shows.

The last of those argues against most of the others. It stays on the list on purpose. A body of work that only ever lands on one side of a question is not analysis, it is marketing.